Database: SQL Server 2000 Standard (works fine)
Database: SQL Server 2005 Standard (fails)
Provider: SQLOLEDB
We can update recordset field (database: MS SQL 2000, client side cursor,
adLockOptimistic), regardless of the recordset's source (query or stored
procedure)
The problem begins with SQL 2005. We cannot update recordset field, if the
recordset is a result of stored procedure.
Error Source: Microsoft Cursor Engine
Error Description: Multiple-step operation generated errors. Check each
status value.> The problem begins with SQL 2005. We cannot update recordset field, if the
> recordset is a result of stored procedure.
Because that's not how you affect data. A recordset is for retrieving and
presenting data. If you want to change the data in the database, use a DML
statement (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE). Better yet, call a stored procedure that
does that.
A|||Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> Database: SQL Server 2000 Standard (works fine)
> Database: SQL Server 2005 Standard (fails)
> Provider: SQLOLEDB
What development platform/language?
> We can update recordset field (database: MS SQL 2000, client side
> cursor, adLockOptimistic), regardless of the recordset's source
> (query or stored procedure)
> The problem begins with SQL 2005. We cannot update recordset field,
> if the recordset is a result of stored procedure.
I'm assuming you've used "SET NOCOUNT ON" in the procedure ...
> Error Source: Microsoft Cursor Engine
> Error Description: Multiple-step operation generated errors. Check
> each status value.
So have you looped through the connection's Errors collection to see the
error message(s)?
If you are developing for ASP, then I will echo Aaron's suggestion: use DML.
If it's a desktop application, then there are some valid reasons (handling
concurrency, etc.) for using a recordset to perform data maintenance.
If none of the above helps, you should post a repro script (DDL and
recordset code) to the group that is focussed on your development platform.
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||Thanks for replies. Our firewall block all notifications. Sorry.
The changes in recordset are not going back to the database. They are only
for UI. This is a legasy code.
Language: VB 6.0
Platform: Windows XP and Win 2003
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" <reb01501@.NOyahoo.SPAMcom> wrote in message
news:ef4gCUrIGHA.3408@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> What development platform/language?
> I'm assuming you've used "SET NOCOUNT ON" in the procedure ...
>
> So have you looped through the connection's Errors collection to see the
> error message(s)?
> If you are developing for ASP, then I will echo Aaron's suggestion: use
> DML.
> If it's a desktop application, then there are some valid reasons (handling
> concurrency, etc.) for using a recordset to perform data maintenance.
> If none of the above helps, you should post a repro script (DDL and
> recordset code) to the group that is focussed on your development
> platform.
> --
> Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
> Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
> header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
> quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>|||Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> Thanks for replies. Our firewall block all notifications. Sorry.
' Data is trnasmitted but error messages are blocked? I don't think this is
possible.
> The changes in recordset are not going back to the database. They are
> only for UI. This is a legasy code.
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here, or why it is relevant
that the code is legacy.
> Language: VB 6.0
> Platform: Windows XP and Win 2003
>
So you plan to follow up in a VB group ... ?
Try microsoft.public.vb.database or microsoft.public.vb.database.ado.
Also, you might try using SQL Profiler to trace the actual commands being
sent to the database by the application: it may provide a clue.
Bob Barrows
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||> I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here
Here is an example:
'get recordset from database as result of "stored_procedure"
'GetData executes ADO command, with Client Side Cursor and optimistic
locking option
Set rs = GetData("stored_procedure")
'translate column1 to Spanish
'Our legasy code use this technique to translate some data, before
presenting them to the client
rs("column1").value = trnalsateToSpanish(rs("column1").value)
'show recordset in the grid
Display(rs)
These lines work fine when we connect to SQL Server 2000
They fail with SQL Server 2005
>why it is relevant
> that the code is legacy.
I would like to find solution that will have minimum impact on the code.
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" <reb01501@.NOyahoo.SPAMcom> wrote in message
news:OXigYR1IGHA.2704@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> ' Data is trnasmitted but error messages are blocked? I don't think this
> is
> possible.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here, or why it is relevant
> that the code is legacy.
>
> So you plan to follow up in a VB group ... ?
> Try microsoft.public.vb.database or microsoft.public.vb.database.ado.
> Also, you might try using SQL Profiler to trace the actual commands being
> sent to the database by the application: it may provide a clue.
> Bob Barrows
> --
> Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
> Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
> header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
> quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>|||Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
<snip>
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> Here is an example:
> 'get recordset from database as result of "stored_procedure"
> 'GetData executes ADO command, with Client Side Cursor and optimistic
> locking option
> Set rs = GetData("stored_procedure")
>
Unless you have set the connection's CursorLocation property to adUseClient,
this line will result in a default server-side forward-only cursor.
To have control over the cursor type, you must:
Set rs= New ADODB.Recordset
rs.CursorLocation=adUseClient
Then either use the command object as the source argument in the recordset's
Open method:
rs.Open cmd
or use the stored-procedure-as-connection-method technique to bypass the
creation of the explicit Command object:
cn.stored_procedure parm1,...parmN, rs
Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||Bob,
>Unless you have set the connection's CursorLocation property to
>adUseClient,
> this line will result in a default server-side forward-only cursor.
I do have MyDBConnection.CursorLocation = adUseClient
Before I was unable to update recordset regardless if was result of stored
procedure or query.
Now I can only do it if it result of the query.
This code works:
Set rs = GetData("select column1 from table1")
rs("column1").value = "abc"
And this code does not work with new SQL Server 2005, but works with SQL
Server 2000:
Set rs = GetData("stored_procedure")
rs("column1").value = "abc"
Thank you.
"Bob Barrows [MVP]" <reb01501@.NOyahoo.SPAMcom> wrote in message
news:epIvE21IGHA.208@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> Unless you have set the connection's CursorLocation property to
> adUseClient,
> this line will result in a default server-side forward-only cursor.
> To have control over the cursor type, you must:
> Set rs= New ADODB.Recordset
> rs.CursorLocation=adUseClient
> Then either use the command object as the source argument in the
> recordset's
> Open method:
> rs.Open cmd
> or use the stored-procedure-as-connection-method technique to bypass the
> creation of the explicit Command object:
> cn.stored_procedure parm1,...parmN, rs
> Bob Barrows
> --
> Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
> Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
> header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
> quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>|||Dmitriy Shapiro wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I do have MyDBConnection.CursorLocation = adUseClient
> Before I was unable to update recordset regardless if was result of
> stored procedure or query.
> Now I can only do it if it result of the query.
> This code works:
> Set rs = GetData("select column1 from table1")
> rs("column1").value = "abc"
> And this code does not work with new SQL Server 2005, but works with
> SQL Server 2000:
> Set rs = GetData("stored_procedure")
>
I'm sorry, but without knowing what the GetData function and the stored
procedure look like, nobody will be able to help you. An I'm sure you are
going to be able to get more help from thhe VB experts in one of the VB
newsgroups.
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
