Multithreading in Sql Server

Hi,
Does sqlserver 2000 supports multi threading?
If so how can we implement it?
As per my knowledge it supports Symmetric multi
processing.
Can you please confirm this?
I posted this in english query section.Iam reposting it
here since this group is more relevant.
Thanks in adavance.
-SriramSQL automatically handles multiple processors... However when you go into
SQL Enterprise Manager, right click your server registration and select
properties, one of the tabs will allow you to choose how many of the
processors to use, 0 means use them all...
One of the diferences between SQL Standard and SQL Enterprise is how much
multi processing goes on during maintenance, like creating indexes... Of
course SQL Enterprise is more scalable.
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Sriram" <surapureddysriram@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:a08a01c4794f$2d51cf50$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Does sqlserver 2000 supports multi threading?
> If so how can we implement it?
> As per my knowledge it supports Symmetric multi
> processing.
> Can you please confirm this?
> I posted this in english query section.Iam reposting it
> here since this group is more relevant.
> Thanks in adavance.
> -Sriram
>|||You don't normally control threading within an application. AFAIK - SQL
Server is a multi-threaded application; there is nothing to "implement".
Perhaps you are confusing multiple threads with multiple processors. If so,
then see Wayne's response.
"Sriram" <surapureddysriram@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:a08a01c4794f$2d51cf50$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Does sqlserver 2000 supports multi threading?
> If so how can we implement it?
> As per my knowledge it supports Symmetric multi
> processing.
> Can you please confirm this?
> I posted this in english query section.Iam reposting it
> here since this group is more relevant.
> Thanks in adavance.
> -Sriram
>sql