I have a stored procedure (lets call him Earl to keep things clear) that executes another sp (lets call him Daryl). Daryl returns a value, and although the last thing the first Earl does is selects a record set to return to the code, the only thing the code can access is values from Daryl. I am using NOCOUNT ON in the beginning of Earl, and NOCOUNT OFF at the end of Earl, but I still get Daryl's values.
I even put NOCOUNT ON / OFF in Daryl, but no such luck. How do I bypass Daryl's values and get to Earl's?
Thanks.
Could you post your code?|||NOCOUNT only effects the rowcount (as in the message (n row(s) affected), and the global @.@.rowcount) not the actual returning of values.
So, are you saying the rowcount is being updated even with SET NOCOUNT ON ?
|||no, nothing to do with the row count I guess.
What it is: because the secondary SP, which is called by the first, uses a select statement, that data generated from the select is being returned from the primary SP, and not the intended data.
Here is a boiled down version of the SP:
alter procedure earl
as
begin
insert into table (x, y, z) values ('a', 1, 'c')
@.id = @.@.identity
exec daryl(@.id )
select * from table where id = @.id
end
alter daryl
@.id int
as
begin
insert into joiningtable (x, y, z) values (@.id, 1, 'c')
@.error = @.@.error
if(@.error > 0)
select @.error as result
else
select @.@.identity as result
end
so the output from Earl is @.@.identity from Daryl, and not "select * from table where id = @.id " from Earl.
Daryl needs to return data, because this SP can be called directly from another function if @.id is known.
|||Earl will return the intended records in the second result set. So you can try to reach the Next resultset.|||Yes, this will return two result sets.
What are you using on the client side to recieve these results? If try this from sqlcmd\osql\SSMS, you will see both result sets.
No comments:
Post a Comment